Monday 25 June 2012

Budra Notes: lecture by Dr Paul Budra (SFU) at Bard on the Beach on June 23, 2012


These are my personal notes from an informational lecture given by Dr Paul Budra (SFU) as part of the Bard Explored: Lecture Series. 

“The Elephant in the Room” – saying the name "Macbeth"
--  As old as the play itself.
--  Two possible sources for it
     a) a boy actor in the 17th century playing the role of Lady Macbeth, died at home
        shortly after returning home from a performance.
    b) real witches saw the play and upset at having their ‘trade secrets’ shared
        cursed the play

Historical Background and Context
--  Mary, Queen of Scots was executed in 1587. Her son was James VI of Scotland. He
    married Anne of Denmark in 1589 and when returning with her to England by ship
    the party were beset by such storms that, in James’s estimation, they could only
    be of supernatural origin. 
--  Witches in Denmark were subsequently found and executed, but they also had to
     find one in England. Enter Agnes Sampson. Under torture she confessed she had
     christened a cat, tied pieces of a dead man to it, set it afloat in a sieve and
     started the storm. James VI was said to be Satan’s greatest enemy on earth and it
     was only his great Christian faith that saved him. Agnes Sampson was executed by
     garrotte and her body burned. This was documented in a pamphlet entitled
     “Wonderful News from Scotland”, published in London.
--  No British monarch published as much as James VI did.
--  In 1597 James VI published an encyclopaedia on Daemonology and was very
    interested in witches and witchcraft

--  Elizabeth I of England died in 1603 and James is proclaimed her successor as
    James I of England.

--  His coronation medal read: James I, Caesar Augustus of Britain, Caesar born of
    Caesars
.
--  All things Scottish suddenly became very fashionable at the royal court.
--  James had a morbid fear of violent death and believed in the sanctity of the
    monarch as God’s Anointed on Earth (published the
Basilikon Doron (royal gift) in
    1597/98).

--  1603 – James I took over the patronage of Shakespeare’s theatre company, the            Lord Chamberlain’s Men, which then became the King’s Men.
--  1605 – Gunpowder Plot (he’d only been on the throne 2 years at that point)
--  1606 – Shakespeare wrote Macbeth featuring witches, the scenario of “what
     happens when you overthrow a king”, and even included topical references to the
     Gunpowder Plot.

--  In Holinshed’s Chronicles, there was a story of a Macbeth who had killed his king
    and was punished for it. A nobleman by the name of Banquo helped Macbeth in the
    murder. Shakespeare could not use that in his play as James I (who was also very
    interested in genealogy) traced his lineage back to that same nobleman. In the
           Chronicles, Macbeth was a good ruler and was king for over 10 years. That bit of
    information Shakespeare also needed to change. 

--  In the story, the prophecy came from “goddesses of destiny”, but because of
    James and his particular interest in the supernatural, they became evil witches.

--  Although James I enjoyed plays, they could not be ‘too long’. Macbeth is
    Shakespeare’s shortest tragedy
(N.B. The 2012 Bard on the Beach production runs
    just over 2 and a half hours, including a 20-minute interval).

--  Christopher Marlowe, in his Dr Faustus, changed the function of a ‘stage devil’
    from clownish and over-the-top to a serious and creepy character. Stories about
    seeing ‘real’ devils on stage started to circulate.

--  Shakespeare plays up common conceptions of witches   
      -> They had familiars (Grey Malkin was a popular name for a cat, Paddock was
          a name for a toad)
      -> They could fly
      -> They reverse things (foul is fair and fair is foul)
--  BUT, the name of Satan is never invoked, the witches are never referred to as
    such; Macbeth and Banquo always call them the “Weird Sisters” (or Wyrd, the
    Anglo-Saxon word) and they seem to be elemental natural forces and ambiguous in
    their sex.

--  Critics ask if the witches are actually important. If they are, why do they
    disappear after Act IV and if they’re not, would Macbeth have done what he did if
    they hadn’t been. Lady Mac calls her husband ambitious but for the milk of human
    kindness he is filled with.

Why are witches usually female?
--  The theory goes that Satan wants to invert the natural order of things and
    therefore empowers women over men.

--  Shakespeare shows this inversion by language and rhythm in the spells of the
   sisters:

    Bubble, bubble, toil and trouble  
    Fire burn and cauldron bubble  
--  Instead of using the usual iambic pentameter (10 syllables of unstressed/stressed
    pairs (iambs), he starts a shorter pattern with a stressed syllable followed by  
    unstressed, and so on.


Mac and Lady Mac
--   Parallel set-up: “Great Glamis (pronounced Gloms)! Worthy Cawdor!”
--  Lady Macbeth greets Macbeth in virtually the same way the Weird Sisters did
--  She is humanised only when she says she couldn’t kill Duncan because he resembled
      her father. (Act II, scene ii). He calls her “dearest love” (Act I, Scene v), “love”
      and “dearest chuck” (Act III, Scene ii) she has no terms of endearment for him
      (my note: unless there is affection in her calling him “My husband”).
--  She is very tightly wound, but when her subconscious takes over (i.e. when she
     sleepwalks), she can no longer hold down her emotions. When the cracks in her
     composure become too great, she kills herself.

--  Macbeth – is a soldier. As a soldier, he is a killing machine. As a soldier, he believes
    in hierarchy. Act I, Scene ii refers to “another Golgotha”, Golgotha, the ‘hill of
    skulls’ on which Christ is believed to have been crucified.

--  In Macbeth’s Act II, Scene i soliloquy, he doesn’t worry about an afterlife, he
    worries about ‘this’ life and that is what he struggles with. Not sure if he sees a
    dagger or not is a manifestation of the struggle he has about breaking rank. All his
    training percolates when he breaks hierarchy. It takes a little while until he gets it
    back together.

--  Macbeth counts as the only protagonist in the Shakespeare canon who knowingly
    does evil. Even Richard III has henchmen, but doesn’t bloody his own hands.

--  Macbeth later comes to the realisation of what he has lost
     o   He does not have what other people of his rank and age ‘should’ have
     o   He has no real friends, only fear and blood.
     o   Orders the killing of children
     o   He is humanised by his own bravery and that he remains courteous throughout
          (in my words: a kind of gentle murderer)
The Porter
--  Is from a medieval dramatic tradition. Between the time Christ is crucifed and is
    resurrected, three days pass. The tradition holds that he descended into hell
    where he cleans house, the so-called “harrowing of hell”. But he has to get by hell’s
    doorman first.

--  The character of the Porter calls upon that tradition and plays with it.
--  Act II, Scene iii the Porter talks about opening the door to three sinners, the first
    a farmer, the second an equivocator, the third a tailor. Equivocator is a reference
    to one of the men convicted (executed) for his part in the Gunpowder Plot. Father
    Henry Garnet was a Jesuit priest. The Jesuits were founded in 1540 by Ignatius of
    Loyola in the Counter-Reformation. Their purpose was to win people back to
    Catholicism (their presence was forbidden in England for that reason) and they
    were a kind of Papal “SWAT” team.

--  The term ‘equivocator’ was used in reference to Garnet because he would not
     impeach himself. He answered questions put to him in riddles, seen as lies.

--  The use of riddles by the Weird Sisters echoes through the play.
Juxtapositions throughout 
--  Hierarchy and order for the soldier descend into chaos --> witches, Satan’s attempts to invert the natural order of things. Taking off ‘the head’ does not mean Macbeth can easily slip into its place.
--  Hospitality --> murder
--  Sterile --> found dynasties
--  Friends --> betrayal
--  Act II, Scene iv
     --> reference to an unnatural storm (lines 6-12)
         ROSS:                   Thou seest, the heavens, as troubled with man's act,
                                     Threaten his bloody stage: by the clock, 'tis day,
                                     And yet dark night strangles the travelling lamp:
                                     Is't night's predominance, or the day's shame,
                                     That darkness does the face of earth entomb,
                                     When living light should kiss it?
         Old Man:                'Tis unnatural,
     --> reversal of hierarchy of birds (lines 13-15)
         Old Man:                 ... On Tuesday last,
                                      A falcon, towering in her pride of place,
                                      Was by a mousing owl hawk'd at and kill'd.
     --> horses become cannibals (lines 16-23)
         ROSS:                     Duncan's horses--a thing most strange and certain --
                                       Beauteous and swift, the minions of their race,
                                       Turn'd wild in nature, broke their stalls, flung out,
                                       Contending 'gainst obedience, as they would make
                                       War with mankind.
         Old Man:                  'Tis said they eat each other.
         ROSS:                      They did so, to the amazement of mine eyes That look'd  
                                         upon't.

Image Patterns
Include:
   --  Blood (most bloody in the world)
   --  Night (never any sunshine)
   --  Time (Where things come together in Macbeth’s mind is in Act V, Scene v, lines
       19-28) – all we’re doing is marking time, it’s all meaningless – absolutely nihilistic.
 
        MACBETH:         To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
                      
                                  Creeps in this petty pace from day to day                               
                                  To the last syllable of recorded time,  
                               
                                  And all our yesterdays have lighted fools  
                               
                                  The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!   

                                  Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player   
                               
                                  That struts and frets his hour upon the stage 
             
                                  And then is heard no more: it is a tale
                               
                                  Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,  
                               
                                  Signifying nothing.
--  The play is saved by its ending: With Malcolm, the good guys win (Act V, Scene
     viii) 
time will mean something again, now the days of the “dead butcher and his            fiend-like queen” (line 69) are behind them; Scotland is redeemed.

Q & A
How is Macbeth like/unlike Richard III
--  Richard III – gleeful and theatrical in his evil doing, he doesn’t care about human
     life

--  Macbeth – solemn, thinks things through, understands the value of a human life,
    that what he’s doing is bad, and then goes ahead regardless.
Difficult to dislike
--  Precisely because he does consider the consequences of his actions, that his
    murders have a purpose (mind, to further ambition and to get rid of the
    competition), a lecture participant expressed that because Macbeth shows again
    and again that he has a conscience, that he’s difficult to dislike.

--  Not so much a question, but a comment. Dr Budra did not disagree.
The view to English Bay is obscured
--  Rightly so, Dr Budra observed. It makes sense: it’s dark, foggy, night (never day)
    in the play. By covering the view it sets the mood. Seeing party boats in the
    distance and kites flying off Kits Point only distract. At the Globe Theatre,
    performances would happen in the daytime, so the repeated mentions of night and
    darkness serve to remind the audience that it’s supposed to be nighttime.

Significance of sleep / dream
--  People in the 16th century were very interested in dream states: changes in
    traits, behaviour, people can act strangely in their dreams.

--  Sleep was viewed as important to rest.
--  Idea/Horror of sleeplessness
--  Guilt bubbled up in sleep – Lady Macbeth is so in control when she’s awake, but
     asleep, she loses control of her emotions.
How was it received?
--  The earliest published record was in 1610 by a Dr Simon Forman and he did not
     review it as much as he gave a fairly accurate plot summary.

Destiny vs Free Will
--  Ask me something easier.

Banquo’s Ghost: is it real
--  It’s only real to the person seeing it and that’s what counts. So, it is real to
    Macbeth and the audience.

The End.

Thursday 14 June 2012

NT Live Encore Presentation: One Man, Two Guvnors - April 2012

Preface: I really wanted to get this review up before the final NTlive encore presentation on the afternoon of May 5. In the meantime a month has gone by, Corden has won the Best Actor Tony Award for his performance in the same role since the show transferred to Broadway a few months ago, and, on a personal note, my physio appointments are done and I can move my right arm and shoulder again without pain.

It seems a little odd to write a review of an encore presentation I saw in a movie theatre on April 26, 2012 of a delayed live broadcast from September 15, 2011. However, since One Man, Two Guvnors recently transferred to Broadway with the “Man” James Corden, his two Guvnors Oliver Chris and Jemima Rooper, as well as Tom Edden (Alfie), Martyn Ellis (Harry Dangle), Trevor Laird (Lloyd), Claire Lams (Pauline), Fred Ridgeway (Charlie), Daniel Rigby (Alan), AND Suzie Toase (Dolly) – essentially everyone in the main roles but the actor who played Gareth (David Benson) in the production I just saw, I believe it still has relevance. If my little review can get more butts in seats both in London with Owain Arthur in the role of Francis and in New York, then all the better, because this is a proper funny show and it’s a lot of fun to watch.

There’s a reason Corden carries the show. As an admirer of the Gavin & Stacey series Corden created and co-wrote with Ruth Jones, I have often tried to put my finger on his appeal - an actor by trade, to my perception, he just exudes sincerity – and then I read a review of the show in an LA Times article in the middle of May that really nailed it for me: “Part of the secret of Corden's comic gift is that he combines innocence so naturally with mischief. Although he's 33, his face is that of an adolescent boy who has just discovered beer, Internet porn and some new flavor of potato chip.”

For those of you who don’t like spoilers, just read this: I found the show utterly enjoyable. Richard Bean’s script pokes fun at the future, it’s witty, and isn’t ‘mere’ slapstick (not that there’s anything wrong with that) and physical comedy; it has a noticeable depth to it which raises it a notch or two above slapstick. There are even educational components such as theatre history in the area of commedia dell’arte and biology in the difference between identical and fraternal twins, all done in a really funny way. 

Jemima Rooper is a joy as Rachel Crabbe masquerading as her deceased brother. I hadn’t seen her in much of anything since the
Lost in Austen mini-series was broadcast here in Canada, so it was great to see her wonderful talent on the stage. Oliver Chris as Stanley Stubbers is note perfect as a very posh, highly educated but not that bright, gangster and these two actors play the two Guvnors Corden’s Francis Henshall is man to. It’s 1963 and the scene is first London and then Brighton. The plot is set in motion when Francis takes on a second job with Stubbers, spends the whole of the play trying to keep them apart (when he’s not falling in love or imagining the deliciousness of food – he’s an uncomplicated man, in search of simple pleasures, and sometimes his mind doesn’t work quite quickly enough to get himself out of situations), not realising that they are a couple and have travelled to Brighton to meet up and run away with one another as Stanley is a wanted man for killing Rachel’s gangster brother while she’s in town collecting some of her brother’s debts so she and Stanley have money to run away with and start over somewhere else. Sounds simple enough, but as the saying goes, nothing is ever easy. 

Great performances also from Tom Edden as the hapless Alfie, Daniel Rigby as Alan, the aspiring actor, and Suzie Toase, the worldly wise and Francis’s match, Dolly. The bonus comes when, on occasion, Corden appears to break character and just lose himself in laughter. It’s obvious he loves what he’s doing and it’s infectious. 


Not to be forgotten, the music! The play starts with the musicians and they return for scene changes as I’ve noticed the National Theatre likes to do. The music is very upbeat and fun and not just lyrically connecting the music to the play, but the actors take turns playing or singing something. Corden plays the xylophone, Chris plays a rack of bicycle horns, Lams, Rooper and Toase sing a song, Ellis plays guitar while Rigby plays his chest (oh yes), Boateng plays the steel drums and they all sing together at the end. With a little research (apparently encore presentations at Cineplex do not include the usual photocopied sheet that functions as a ‘programme’), I found that all the music is original to this production and was written by Grant Olding, the lead singer for the play’s band called
The Craze. As an aside, he even looks like a nerdier and younger version of Martin Freeman with the period costuming (1963) and glasses, also not a bad thing. 

I’m not going to give this play a high-brow review because it isn’t a high-brow show. Sometimes you just want to laugh, and as an audience member of this show, laugh you will.
One Man, Two Guvnors will continue its run on Broadway through the summer and is scheduled to close September 2/2012. 

Quote from: http://articles.latimes.com/2012/may/17/entertainment/la-ca-james-corden-20120520 by Charles McNulty.

Image from www.cineplex.com.